I agree that 72 hours should be the minimum. For reference, this thread [0] from August 2021 proposed using 48 hours for the PIP voting period, and it explains why the wiki says 48 hours.
> (3) to allow time for contributors who are not working full time on the > project. I think this point is crucial, especially when we have several votes open at one time. Thanks, Michael [0] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m8dr0hz7qn7rkd48bcp430lcq2q3674g On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 10:17 PM Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Yes please! I did not notice that. > > Personally I would be ok with 72 hours lazy consensus, but if we must vote > then 72 hours is a minimum. > > Thanks, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 3, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > The "48 hours" rule is on [1]. > > Maybe we should update the wiki and PIP template first? > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Pulsar-Improvement-Proposal-%28PIP%29 > > > >> On 2022/01/04 03:59:45 Dave Fisher wrote: > >> The ASF considers that the minimum time for a vote is 72 hours for a few > >> reasons particularly: > >> > >> (1) to allow the world to spin. People are in most time zones. > >> (2) to allow for weekends. > >> (3) to allow time for contributors who are not working full time on the > >> project. > >> > >> Many projects use a 7 day vote. > >> > >> We just had 2 PIP votes called for 48 hours so this rule is worth > >> reiterating! > >> > >> All the best, > >> Dave > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > > Haiting Jiang >
