Hi Rajan, As discussed in the Pulsar Community Meeting today, I added the "Modification Summary" section that compares the current solutions and our proposals.
Regards, Heesung On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:24 PM Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:37 PM Rajan Dhabalia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Also, here we have to clearly document that it will not impact behavior of > > existing load-balancers now or in future. Pulsar is used by many companies > > and orgs so, deprecating and not maintaining existing components is not > > acceptable in any circumstances. > > This is exactly the reason why this is going to be implemented as a > new loadmanager instead of improving the existing > ModularLoadManagerImpl. > > It gives the flexibility to start fresh without the existing baggage > of choices and try a significantly different approach. > > The current ModularLoadManagerImpl will not go away. Once the new load > manager will be ready and considered stable enough, there might be a > new discussion on whether to change the default implementation. Even > then, users will still be able to opt for the old load manager.
