Close this vote with 3 +1(binding) - Penghui - Jiwei Guo (Tboy) - Mattison
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 5:02 PM mattison chao <mattisonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1(binding) > > Best, > Mattison > On 8 Oct 2023 at 14:49 +0800, Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org>, wrote: > > Totally I'm +0 at the moment. I'm still wondering which issue you > > really want to resolve. I left a comment > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21271#issuecomment-1751899833. > > Generally you can get latest value unless the producer is far quicker > > than the reader. However, even with the refreshAsync() method, in the > > future's callback, the data could still be updated. > > > > From my perspective, this proposal only makes sense when you can > > guarantee there is no more data written to the topic when you call > > methods of TableView. But if so, a simple `boolean hasReachedLatest()` > > method could do the trick. > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 2:12 PM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (no-binding) > > > > > > > > > Xiangying Meng <xiangy...@apache.org>于2023年9月27日 周三15:05写道： > > > > > > > > Hi dev, > > > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-302 Add new API > > > > > refreshAsync for TableView. > > > > > Discuss thread: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/o085y2314o0fymvx0x8pojmgjwcwn59q > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21166 > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > Xiangying > > > > >
