Il giorno lun 6 mag 2024 alle ore 09:07 PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> For the backlog quota check, I think we also need the same capacity. > > For configurable. I think the reason is users can have their plugins > running > with the broker which relies on the Pulsar topic. They don't want the > application to > change the TTL or backlog policies for some subscription/cursor. But now, > if user set > the TTL or backlog policy for a namespace, all the subscriptions will be > affected. > I see. We can make this "configurable", but the well known names should be always handled automatically Enrico > > Penghui > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:51 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not > good > > and we should not make it configurable. > > > > First, we have to make a call to the TTL thing, otherwise we will end up > in > > using that for other stuff, and not only TTL. > > > > Second, we shouldn't make this configurable. Those cursors depend on the > > version of Pulsar and users who upgrade from previous versions won't > update > > the configuration and this will lead to problems. And we cannot ask users > > to update the configuration when updating > > > > Enrico > > > > Il Lun 6 Mag 2024, 08:02 Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > > > LGTM, very useful. Thanks for driving this. > > > > > > -Lari > > > > > > On 2024/05/04 16:01:41 Hang Chen wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system > > > > cursors. Please help take a look, thanks. > > > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22651 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hang > > > > > > > > > >
