In the past period of time, we have initiated several discussions with other companies and Pulsar community developers, and improved the project as follows:
As you can see, there are one license [1], one SECURITY file [2], CI workflows[3], and more commits in the last two weeks [4]. there are one best practice part[5] and execution plan [6]. Secondly, maintaining this repo requires Pulsar PMC's care. now there are two PMC members who support to maintain it. [7] [1] license file: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib?tab=License-1-ov-file [2] SECURITY file: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib?tab=security-ov-file [3] CI workflows: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/8/checks [4] commits in the last two weeks: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/commits/stable/ [5] best practice: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/tree/stable/pulsar-client-common-contrib/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/impl [6] execution plan: https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/issues/7 [7] VOTE for PIP-367: https://lists.apache.org/thread/td0j8l1c3l93nny0m5smnsdmb91j1n2y On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:25 PM xiangying meng <xiangy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, I want to start a vote on PIP-367: Propose a Contributor > Repository for Pulsar > > You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23061 > and > the discussion thread at > https://lists.apache.org/thread/75y70j6pqw15271b0tq8j637tb02mrwo > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours. > > BR, > Xiangying >
