The current PCIP is an open discussion. If I am wrong, please correct me. Thank you.
Your suggestion is very good. Pulsar-java-contrib is an open repository. I am not sure about the necessity of PCIP. The original idea of building this PCIP is to make some larger Improvement Proposals known to the Pulsar community to prevent the project from being deformed. If the PCIP process is simplified to just make developers of the Pulsar community known, do you think it is necessary? On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 1:24 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > This is in no way a comment about the proposed work. In fact that work > should proceed. > > This is about what looks like extraneous process. I thought that the > purpose of this new repository was to streamline and ease the development > of new ideas and contributions. Adding a new PCIP process seems to be > contrary to this purpose. > > Best, > Dave > > > On Oct 12, 2024, at 5:24 AM, Denovo1998 (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Denovo1998 commented on code in PR #8: > > URL: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/8#discussion_r1797693657 > > > > > > ########## > > pcip/TEMPLATE.md: > > ########## > > @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ > > +<!-- > > > > Review Comment: > > Added in https://github.com/apache/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/9. > > > > > > > > -- > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org > > > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > > us...@infra.apache.org > > > >
