The document has been updated, please review it again. For now, let's not consider adding the "index" to the parameters.
Thanks, sinan xiangying meng <xiangy...@apache.org> 于2025年6月10日周二 12:03写道： > Hello, Sinan, > > I hold the opposite view on this matter. There is no need to provide > the index parameter for this admin API, just as there is no need to > add an index as a parameter for every interface that uses message ID > as an input. > > If a user chooses to use an index instead of a message ID, they should > maintain the mapping relationship between the message ID and the index > themselves. Pulsar's APIs, however, should exclusively use the message > ID as a parameter. > > PIP-415 exists exactly to assist users in maintaining this mapping > relationship between message IDs and indices. > > BR, > Xiangying >
