On 2025/07/26 05:08:18 PengHui Li wrote: > The proposal looks good to me. > > I noticed the PR will change the existing RangeEntryCacheImpl to ship this > improvement. > Is it better to have a new Class name and make it configurable? > The existing RangeEntryCacheImpl has been used for many years, we'd better > consider a way to roll out the improvement to the hot path smoothly. > We can keep the new implementation enabled by default, but allow users to > change back to the existing solution without rolling back the entire > cluster. > > Best, > Penghu
Thank you, Penghui. This is a vote thread, so we can handle this concern separately once the work proceeds in implementation PRs. -Lari
