Hi all, It seems we don't have a standard for labelling milestone. sometimes I am not lost and confused when I see a change was merged to master but marked in a bug fix milestone. so I am raising a discussion about this.
I think every pull request that was created based on master, which would be merged as a commit of master, those pull requests should be first marked as major release milestone, for example: `2.2.0` release. If a pull request that was created based on a branch, which would be merged as a commit of that branch, those pull requests should be marked as minor release milestones, for example: `2.1.1` release. so that we have a clearer way on tracking what changes have been made to what releases. otherwise it is a bit hard to track when we have multiple releases ongoing. Thoughts? Thanks, Sijie
