From: Jörg Jahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:25:31 +0200
Hi,
> To make finding a QA rep. in such cases easier we could implement the
> following changes to the EIS application:
> - The QA rep. field is no longer mandatory
> - If left open when the rest of the data is filled, then a missing QA
> rep. means that the CWS owner is still looking for a tester
- if a CWS without QA representative is created, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Would you use this feature and check the list of CWSs without QA rep.
> and volunteer to do CWS testing?
I do not know. I am often QA of build related stuff only and people set me
as QA after consulting with me. But I'm personally not looking for more QA
work ;-)
> - Is there a better way to solve the problem?
> - What about the last item above, am I right to say an email to the CWS
> owner is the best way? Or would it be better to have the volunteer
> automatically register as QA rep.?
I think the owner should set the QA rep, not QA. QA volunteer should reply
to an e-mail sent above, then the owner can set the QA in EIS.
--
Pavel Janík
Pentium(TM) 4 Extremely Expensive(TM)
-- Tonnerre in LKML
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
