Hi *,
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:14:38AM +0100, CPHennessy wrote:
> On Fri April 7 2006 16:54, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:52:54PM +0100, CPHennessy wrote:
> [...]
> > > 1) choose from : installation, writer, calc, impress, database, printing,
> > > upgrading, other (e.g. web, other langs, ... ? )
> > >
> > > 2) choose version ( latest version being the default - with links to
> > > download it).
> >
> > maintaining that in javascript would be a nightmare anyway.
> Not necessarily. You could have a script which checks out the file from CVS
> and updates it if a new release is available, and checks the code back in.
What file would you check out? You cannot get IZ-information from cvs.
> > [...]
> > would require a way to get a list of valid subcomponents and to choose a
> > default. While the first part is already not possible, the second one is
> > even more difficult. Given that there are efforts to add more
> > subcomponents to ease dispatching of issues to the right developer,
> > hiding this field would be a step in the opposite direction.
> Maybe adding a new subcomponent "unknown" is not unreasonable.
It is. It puts more burden on QA. QA can barely cope with the issues
filed currently. Having more issues that need more time to dispatch is
counter-productive.
ciao
Christian
--
NP: Metallica - Wasting My Hate
Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
