>My feeling is, that we will bring in complexity in again by doing this. >I'd rather have those rules documented for QA members, so that priority >is correctly choosen in the second step.
Fair enough. That's part of what we're here for anyway, I guess. >I don't think, we need to revoke access to the interface. (Hey, we are >an open project, completely revoking access would hurt more than it >would help.) The idea is to have a way to report bugs that fits the >users needs. And as we have dufferent users, we should have different ways. I agree. There will always be the risk of people abusing the system, but closing the system to most users is not the solution. I was just following the thought of not allowing regular users access to priority to its logical (?) conclusion... So the argument for not putting priority in the simple interface is really just to make the interface simpler, not that the users of the simple interface shouldn't be allowed to set the priority. Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
