Hi Thorsten,
this means for me if I get positive feedback from the various builders
for m175 that I can continue with the regular nomination process.
thanks,
Martin
Thorsten Ziehm wrote:
Hi,
nearly the full set of automated testscripts ran on m173 (Windows,
Linux, Solaris Sparc and Solaris x86) and they found some regressions.
But the number is not so high. The evaluation of the errors and warnings
in the test results will take some more days. But it seems that the
general quality of OOo is still good.
I'm optimistically that we will have fixed all regressions before
OOo2.0.4 is released. But this will also mean, that we need more QA by
the OOo community on the current builds as well. In my opinion it isn't
a problem to get the regression fixed in time, it is a problem to find
them quickly and in time.
Thorsten
Martin Hollmichel wrote On 07/05/06 17:20,:
Hi,
with m173 we integrated warnings01 and we expected some problems
around because of the high amount of changed lines of code. We used
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66757 to track those
issues, but so far we only discovered very few issues at runtime, most
issues were raised because of slightly different build configurations.
I'm using m173 since some time now and my impression are quite good,
is anybody on this list able to confirm my impressions with some more
real data (amount crashreports also did not raise with m173) ?
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
