Hi Andre, > first of all: I support this idea
glad to hear this. > Juste a note: with "discussed in the project" and "escalated to the > project lead" we speak about the project, that is the issue owner (e.g. > sw for a Word Processor Issue). Escalation to the project leads list > might be difficult, if the concerns are brought in by users and the > project lead is not responsive. Users are normally not subscribed to the > project leads list .. so we have no way to escalate. > I'd say, we should name the qa project (or the council'S communit > representative) as a possible way for escalation (if responsible project > lead is not responsive). Sounds reasonable. Could you suggest a wording for the policy which states this? (side note: Later on, it's probably a good idea putting the policy into the Wiki ...) Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
