Maho-san: Thank you. I have m169 and XCode 2.4.1 on my Intel system. What happens does not occur (as far as I know and I can test this with my PBG4) on the Power PC platform. The problem is that a functional testtool baseline is needed for the testtool upgrade that is going to happen next month (I cannot repeat this enough times).
It is either that or we start looking at a functional testtool process elsewhere. Automated testing reduces the amount of time and effort to discover problems. It is not possible, however, to test some of the wizards with this product and they will still require manual testing. James McKenzie >From: NAKATA Maho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Dec 24, 2006 6:20 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Re: [mac] Looking for Mac OS X Intel builds for >milestones between m169 and m175 > >From: James Mckenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Re: [mac] Looking for Mac OS X Intel builds for >milestones between m169 and m175 >Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:05:04 -0700 (GMT-07:00) > >> I am trying to find the code that broke testtool. Once that is found, a >> reversal can take place that will fix this, as a temporary measure. A more >> permenent fix is to correct the UNO Intel problem. >> >okay now I understand what you are thinking. Right. >I'll provide builds. Apparently may take a while...though >thanks >-- NAKATA, Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
