Id like you to address the question of the role testtool has within TCM
and the question of an update to the (l10n) Testtool environment. Given
the fact that testtool is part of Release sanity test and also a number
of other test scenarios, one can not simply think it away. Otoh I have
yet to find somebody among 136 testers who has passed (or failed) any
entries involving testtool. My opinion: striking it out test cases would
mean lowering qa standards. Otoh keeping it in would involve first some
more effort, before the tool gets out to the community - right now I
have my doubts about it. I am spending more time on adjusting testtool
to my local conditions than on testing 2.1. jsi is away on holidays etc...
In any case a policy statement would be welcome.
TiA
smo
Rafaella Braconi wrote:
Dear All,
last week, Charles, Maho and myself succeeded in finding a time slot
to set up a meeting on l10n QA.
Here the details for the IRC QA topic:
Date/Time: January 9th, 2007 1:00 pm CET (Paris time) - 2:15 pm CET
(Paris time)
Meeting logistics: IRC network FreeNode, #ooonlc
Agenda:
- Scope of this meeting - 5 minutes
- Major steps in the l10n QA process - 10 minutes
- l10n TCM testing - 10 minutes
- QATracktool - 10 minutes
- Approval for release QA for localized package
- Q&A
Just let me know if you wish to add any other QA relevant topics to
the agenda
Regards,
Rafaella
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
