Caio: Update the RFEs as appropriate. If the additional functionality applies to the 2.0 series, make the version 2.0. This would be much better than 'current' as this more applies to defects or tasks.
James McKenzie -----Original Message----- >From: Caio Tiago Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Jan 13, 2007 12:32 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [qa-dev] Handling 1.1 or older RFE's > >1.1 bugs are trivial to handle, it's just to close them if they don't >apply to 2.0, off course. > >1.1 RFE's are usually handled the same way. >But RFE's are quite different, since they don't apply to some specific >version of the product. > >As stated in the bug writing >guidelines<http://www.openoffice.org/bugs/bug_writing_guidelines.html>, >the version should be the one you first find the issue (if applicable). > > From my point of view, it's not applicable for requests of new >enhancements or features. > >My purpose is, after confirming they still required, either: >use current as the version >or: >change it to 2.0. > >Since makes more sense the "version" for an enhancement or feature means >the version to which it's applicable, than a specific version (always >major versions, by the way, never 2.1.1 or so on). > > >Anyone dislike it or have a better solution? > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
