Clytie Siddall wrote:


On 12/01/2007, at 2:14 AM, Lars D. Noodén wrote:

Please read http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/ooo_qa_reloaded1 if you're interested into this.


It's interesting, I hope it results in something with a negligable barrier for participation.


+1

I suggest, for the text (focus on actions):
___
     Report Bugs
Submit new bugs, request new/enhanced features, or search for known problems.
         Manual Testing
Test your build and monitor your testing with our dedicated tools
         Join QA Team
We need your ideas and experience! Come and help make OpenOffice.org even better.

QA test cases for specific OpenOffice.org components:
         Writer
create and modify text, rich text or html documents, including formulæ (using Math)
         Calc
layout spreadsheets, and output charts of many kinds (using Chart)
         Graphics
manipulate images of all kinds with Draw, including presentations (using Impress)
         Database
organize, cross-reference and search for categorized information with Base

Testing different aspects of OpenOffice.org
         Framework
Work with the code structure, develop extensions and improve the API
         Automation
Improve automatic processes, create better testing tools
         Localization & Documentation
Translate and describe OpenOffice.org for your community
         Special
If it doesn't fit in anywhere else, we're doing it! Come and find out why.


         Miscellaneous
General info, guidelines, statistics, mailing lists, all those handy details
___

I had to guess the function of some of the sections, so sorry if I got them wrong.

this part will contain the application dependent info for each section - the concept is still in progress, but the principal structure is good prooven for years in the sun qa team

It's also difficult to avoid repetition in the middle section, because basically all four sub-sections are simply different angles on the same thing.

yes, but i have maybe learned how to avoid the boring 'in this area - here you can' :)

I suggest, for the text (focus on actions):
___
    Report Bugs
Submit new bugs, request new/enhanced features, or search for known problems.
        Manual Testing
Test your build and monitor your testing with our dedicated tools
        Join QA Team
We need your ideas and experience! Come and help make OpenOffice.org even better.

QA test cases for specific OpenOffice.org components:
        Writer
create and modify text, rich text or html documents, including formulæ (using Math)
        Calc
layout spreadsheets, and output charts of many kinds (using Chart)
        Graphics
manipulate images of all kinds with Draw, including presentations (using Impress)
        Database
organize, cross-reference and search for categorized information with  Base

Testing different aspects of OpenOffice.org
        Framework
Work with the code structure, develop extensions and improve the API
        Automation
Improve automatic processes, create better testing tools
        Localization & Documentation
Translate and describe OpenOffice.org for your community
        Special
If it doesn't fit in anywhere else, we're doing it! Come and find out  why.


        Miscellaneous
General info, guidelines, statistics, mailing lists, all those handy details
___

in each section you get the qa relevant stuff for each application - so the description should not be the commercial to use the single components in principal it is a gate for similar things in divided projects, so boring can also be good overviewable - your text is more interesting, but i have to read more and at the end i am maybe confused or i realize later that it is in principal the same - so in my boring version you get the main info faster: 'similar content for different applications/projects' and can faster go forward - maybe we need anything in between?

So I suggest keeping that repeated text out of the sub-sections, as I've done here, and specify only the differing information. That way, someone wanting to specialize in one area of QA can choose their component.

I hope this is useful. :)

yes, thank you


from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to