You misunderstood me. I did not say #72502 was closed, but my issue
#73643 was closed after setting it duplicate.
No, I didn't. I meant issue #72502 was not closed, so you shouldn't
assume it had been integrated to the master and file another issue for
the same issue.
I did not file another issue becomes I assumed that. I wrote the issue
because I did not find the other one, otherwise I would have saved a lot
of work documenting it.
Yes, that's clear to me. However I did expect that OOF680_m1, after
calling it officially a "beta" is complete though it is not an "RC"
yet.
What do you mean with "complete"?
By "complete" I mean all scheduled corrections and new features have been
included. I wouldn't call anything "Beta" if there are still things
scheduled to be included.
Can we expect that this CWS will be integrated before release of 2.2?
In the next milestone.
I hope you mean the upcoming OOF680_m2 and not an m200?
Regards
Guido
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
