Hi Thorsten, On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:58:02AM +0200, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > > could this the starting point that QA have to set CWS back to the CWS > owner, when a result of tinderbox is red?
If it is read, then you need to have a look. Don't blindly reflag it. Check the log. If QA cannot tell whether the error is a false positive or a real one, QA should ask the devs of the cws to clarify. > [...] > I have only one question, which is the current situation. How could > see the CWS Owner or QA Rep if the build breaker isn't also on the > Master? Currently #75975# breaks the Mac builds. > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75975 See http://go-oo.org/tinderbox/ready_for_QA.express.html Tinderbox builds the master-workspaces as well. If a build-breaker is discovered in a master-ws, an issue is filed. The patch of that issue is then applied to the source when a cws based on that milestone is build. It seems to me that people always talk about things before even having a look, before even trying to find out :-/ The status indicator on the tinderbox overview pages list the applied patches. ciao Christian -- NP: Apocalyptica - Welcome Home (Sanitarium) Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
