Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > Hi Sophie, > > what test cases do you mean? Hum, not sure you read this thread ;) I mean TCM L10n like in the subject. > > The general functionality of new features are tested before integration > of these features. You will find test case specifications or links to > automated test cases in the feature list for OOo2.3 [1]. So it isn't > needed to write new test cases. Only to translate them if you want some feed back for non English speaking communities. Ans some test case are not present in your list, may be they are not needed ? > > Currently the test cases in TCM are only for areas, where translated > strings change the functionality or where native speakers have to check > if the defaults for their languages are correct (e.g. date format). Yes, and from what I know, their is 5287 new words in the GUI. My question was: are the corresponding tests present in the TCM ? otherwise why should we do TCM test case ? > Testing of general functionality isn't and shouldn't be part of TCM. > Here I think we need a new tooling, or we have to link complex test > cases in TCM. Ha, I'm quite surprised as we are doing those tests for several releases now. What do you mean by new tooling ? If I want my team to test the FR release, I need to upload the manual tests on TCM (like the one Validity described following your link for example) to be able to track the results on the plateform our group is testing on. Do you mean it is useless and won't bring anything ? > > So what do you mean with new test cases? Testing general functionality > or L10N related issues for the new feature? I mean l10n QA, but I'm now puzzled by the fact that new functionnalities shouldn't go on TCM. And I find it sometime very difficult to separate the l10n part to the functionnality part in a bug. Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
