Hi again :)
On 28/01/2008, at 12:53 AM, André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Clytie Siddall schrieb:
...
Do we have docs on using the new QATrack yet?
The new qatrack is still in developmend - Per is still working on
build submission.
Does that mean we should use the old QATrack? The new one looks much
more intuitive.
I tried to submit a current build:
ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/680/OOH680_m4/Build-1/OOo_2.4.0_080123_Win32Intel_install_vi.exe
but QATrack wasn't happy with it. It said "Found No", although the
file isn definitely there, and although it showed the overall
filename correctly at the top of the page, further down it showed:
OOo_2.4.0_080123_Win32vitel_install_vi.exe
Strange - this workedfor me an current and upcoming QATrack
(qatrack.services.openoffice.org vs. qatrack.projects.ooodev.org)
It seems to handle everything but the "Intel" part. Or am I using
the wrong kind of URL?
I don't know - what URL exactly did you use?
The one I quoted.
As I said, the same thing happened with the URL to the Mac build on
Maho's server, except the word "Intel" was munged in a different way. :S
from Clytie
Vietnamese Free Software Translation Team
http://vnoss.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=projects:l10n
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
