Hello, Andre Schnabel schrieb: > Hi,
sorry for the delay, but first the release of the version 3.1.1 had to be done. > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> An: dev@qa.openoffice.org > >> Quick clarification - if you are referring to the release process; it is >> different for the extensions. I have no idea how the release decision is >> made for the Currnet Base extensions from Sun Microsystems. > > Yes - my point was more related to the relase process. But the release > process is connected to the QA process (e.g. you need to know > which version of an extensions needs to be checked against which > version of OOo, when needs an extension to be "ready to release" ...). Most of the informations for the "Current Base extensions from Sun Microsystems" are published at the dba lists. > I don't know, if this was discussed in Hamburg - but if we can > establish a QA process for extensions, all extensions that are QA'ed > following this process might get a special quality seal. "Community > approved" or something like that. This was discussed in Hamburg but without any result :( Does we have a proposal? Regards Mechtilde -- Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann ## http://de.openoffice.org ## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## Meine Seite http://www.mechtilde.de ## PGP encryption welcome! Key-ID: 0x53B3892B --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qa.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qa.openoffice.org
