As I mentioned earlier, please start another vote if you'd like to. Marnie
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Robert Godfrey <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > is graduatation not a good enough reason, > > As per Aidan's earlier comment it seems like graduation and the > milestone numbering scheme should not be erroneously linked. > > > and that everyone wants to get rid of it? > > > > I see this situation as akin to the vote on the Monarchy in > Australia... The majority agrees that the current situation is > anachronistic and wrong, but people have not yet come to a settled > majority verdict on what it should be replaced it with. > > I *really* don't want to label Qpid as v0.x because I think that > undermines the maturity that is present in the current product (you > may even know some people releasing commercial product off the back of > it ;-) )... However if you force me to vote now on a non M scheme I > would have to vote for 0.x. That would also imply that the next major > release would be 1.0. I actually think that when the time comes to > move to a full X.0 release we should start at something like v3.0 > since there are at least two earlier stable baselines that people may > be currently using. > > At the end of the day if the majority want to move to 0.5 or 1.5 now, > I'm happy to abide by that decision - but I think that in the > interests of democracy it is wrong to exclude "No change" from the > current vote. > > -- Rob > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > >
