On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael Schloming <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aidan Skinner wrote: >> I don't think that adding 0-10 support to the Java broker is the only >> step necessary before we declare ourselves 1.0. I'm not sure that >> there's a consensus around what would be Qpid 1.0 just now. > > What else do you feel is necessary? For me it's all about interop across the > different languages, and the biggest part of that is 0-10 support in the > Java broker. I'd also like to see some progress on protocol neutral APIs in > other languages, but I actually think thats an area where we can whip things > into shape with relatively little work. Interop and stable APIs are the two things for me. I'm not sure that protocol-neutral APIs are necessary so long as they'd at least be backwards compatible from then on out until a major rev eg. when everything spoke AMQP 1-0 and only 1-0. I don't think we're that far away from a N.0 either FWIW, just clarify what we mean and what we need to do to get there. - Aidan -- Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing http://qpid.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
