We have two forms in use for boolean options to qpidd. The first form is where the presence of an option implies that its value is true. E.g.
--no-module-dir --no-data-dir --tcp-nodelay --require-encryption -t --trace -d --daemon -c --check -q --quit -h --help The second is where the value for the boolean follows the option. E.g. -m --mgmt-enable yes|no --auth yes|no Does anyone have a strong view on the desirability of making this more consistent? I myself have a slight preference for --no-auth over --auth no; I'm less bothered about the --mgmt-enable option but that could be --no-mgmt. The next question is whether - if we do change these - we should also keep the original options for backward compatability? Any thoughts or comments? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
