The same for me...I would be happy to help on this topic. Especially if it should be part of QMan :) Bryan, just for curiosity, could you explain me better? I believe that a resource exposed for management must be stateful so I suppose you were talking about a stateful session bean isn'it ? A stateless or an entity bean is pooled so how it's possible to bind a specific instance on qmf? Anyway, if you want i'm really interested in this topic so maybe should be possible to do something together :)
Regards Andrea On 2/16/09, Carl Trieloff <[email protected]> wrote: > Bryan Kearney wrote: >> Carl Trieloff wrote: >>> >>> Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping >>> needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some & >>> discussed.. want to help /contribute to it? >>> Carl. >>> >> >> I would be happy to help! Do you have discussions documented some >> place for me to read? > > some content on wiki, lets see if it can be organized / updated and then > will post a pointer to it. > > Carl. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > -- Sent from my mobile device --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
