Yes, what I mean is the concept of message selector, not how we implement it. And Xquery is mush more powerful than SQL-92 syntax.By MQ, I refer to Message Queue instead of a particular message queue project.
I am a little confused about how could my patches related to patent issue? Chenta On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Robert Greig <robert.j.gr...@gmail.com>wrote: > 2009/3/22 chenta lee <che...@gmail.com>: > > > Message selector is a popular and essential feature for MQ(ActiveMQ > already > > implemented it). I am not sure if they can patent it. > > Can you be a bit more explicit about what you mean? Are you referring > the JMS selectors but with semantics that enable the use of xquery on > message content, rather than the SQL-like syntax on message headers > (as defined in the JMS specification)? > > Also by MQ are you referring to IBM MQ? IBM MQ does not as far as I am > aware implement xquery selectors as described above. > > RG > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > >
