On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Martin Ritchie <ritch...@apache.org> wrote: > >> 2009/5/26 Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com>: > >>> I think we probably need to tidy these up and split by component a >>> bit, perhaps something like: >> >> I was trying to prevent subjective addition of features by purely going by >> JIRA. >> I could list the JIRAs by Component Type, would that be better?: > > I think by Component is a good way to go, but I think we really need > to turn the summaries into meaningful English. The Jira's can be a > little... obtuse... for normal people.
By which I mean we should rewrite the summaries from Jira. Having the Jira ID for the feature is probably worth retaining as well. - Aidan -- Apache Qpid - Give me convenience or give me death http://qpid.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org