On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Martin Ritchie <ritch...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> 2009/5/26 Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com>:
>
>>> I think we probably need to tidy these up and split by component a
>>> bit, perhaps something like:
>>
>> I was trying to prevent subjective addition of features by purely going by 
>> JIRA.
>> I could list the JIRAs by Component Type, would that be better?:
>
> I think by Component is a good way to go, but I think we really need
> to turn the summaries into meaningful English. The Jira's can be a
> little... obtuse... for normal people.

By which I mean we should rewrite the summaries from Jira. Having the
Jira ID for the feature is probably worth retaining as well.

- Aidan
-- 
Apache Qpid - Give me convenience or give me death
http://qpid.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to