Rafael Schloming wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
2009/7/8 Rafael Schloming <[email protected]>:
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Author: rhs
Date: Tue Jul 7 19:45:04 2009
New Revision: 791954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=791954&view=rev
Log:
Reverted 787626 as it was causing the regular profiles to fail.
Uh, it is? They passed fine for me. What problem were you seeing?
The cleanBroker() ends up deleting the data directory out from
underneath
the running broker causing it to die.
I suspect the problem you're seeing with QPID-1935 is actually a real
broker
bug where it's failing to update the persistent store when messages are
dequeued causing one test to interfere with the next.
--Rafael
If the cleanBoker/delete was done before the super.setUp() call then
the broker would not be running so it should't be a problem.
Possibly, but cleanBroker() isn't really meant to be used that way, and
it invalidates the test anyways. You really shouldn't have to clean for
the test to pass. As I said, I'm pretty sure if the test is failing when
persistence is enabled it's pointing to an actual bug.
It's actually probably this bug to be specific:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1917
--Rafael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
