I echo Robert comments, this seems a very compelling deadline for release.

It boils down to whether we have people able to make it happen just now ?

Marnie

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Robert Greig <[email protected]>wrote:

> 2009/10/14 Aidan Skinner <[email protected]>:
>
> >> tremendous opportunity that we as a project must not miss. If
> >> necessary we need to be creative, and put together some "PDC 0.6
> >> Preview" release that perhaps covers the key bits of 0.6 where they
> >> are essential. For example, I imagine we do not need the Java broker,
> >> so we should not let its readiness impact a PDC release.
> >
> > We've talked about doing split release in the past, but it's been met
> > with some pretty strong arguments against it. I'd like to avoid
> > rehashing those if possible.  ;)
>
> Previously, however, we did not have the immovable deadline of a PDC.
> I think we have to been pragmatic about this.
>
> I think we should be de-risking the release as much as possible to
> ensure that we get something useful for the PDC. We can always follow
> up afterwards with a mop-up release.
>
> RG
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to