> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:03 PM
> To: cctriel...@redhat.com; dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Release numbering suggestion
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
> > One late suggestion to the thread. after release update the
> > trunk to 0.7.
>
> Right, but my point is that this week's 0.7 is not the same as next
> week's 0.7. So you still can't really identify what someone is working
> with just by saying 0.7, so what are we really buying with this scheme?

Not much for the developers.  Lots for us users.  Us users can start making RPM 
packages of development versions and know immediately whether a dev or stable 
version is installed.  Right now that is not possible.

Going forward, you will be working on version 0.7.  I create a number of qpid 
0.7 RPMs as development progresses to test various features.  0.7 is released.  
Two months later I check the packages that are installed on my system. RPM 
tells me qpid 0.7 is installed.  Is it development or a released version?

Rob

This e-mail and files transmitted with it are confidential, and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise 
have reason to believe that you received this message in error, please 
immediately notify sender by e-mail, and destroy the original message. Thank 
You.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to