> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:03 PM > To: cctriel...@redhat.com; dev@qpid.apache.org > Subject: RE: Release numbering suggestion > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com] > > One late suggestion to the thread. after release update the > > trunk to 0.7. > > Right, but my point is that this week's 0.7 is not the same as next > week's 0.7. So you still can't really identify what someone is working > with just by saying 0.7, so what are we really buying with this scheme?
Not much for the developers. Lots for us users. Us users can start making RPM packages of development versions and know immediately whether a dev or stable version is installed. Right now that is not possible. Going forward, you will be working on version 0.7. I create a number of qpid 0.7 RPMs as development progresses to test various features. 0.7 is released. Two months later I check the packages that are installed on my system. RPM tells me qpid 0.7 is installed. Is it development or a released version? Rob This e-mail and files transmitted with it are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you received this message in error, please immediately notify sender by e-mail, and destroy the original message. Thank You. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org