+1 I have installed the Java Broker, connected a client and sent some messages ok on Windows.
(For 0.7 we should resolve the ssl paths in the config.xml file so that it starts ootb, but this isn't a blocker for 0.6 - merely a comment as I notice.) The license file etc look ok to me. Thanks & Regards, Marnie On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com>wrote: > The latest release candidate for qpid (0.6rc5) has been out for a day or > so and I've had no negative comments on it. > > In my opinion it is a small set of incremental improvements low risk on > all the previous release candidates, and has reached the point where > it's good enough for release. > > Therefore I'd like to call for a vote to release this release candidate > (0.6rc5) "as is" relabelled as 0.6. In other words the identical source > bits as rc5 except changing the name. > > The subversion revision is: 905578 > ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/qpid ) > > The rules for a release vote are: > ( http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes ) > > * Simple majority required. > * No veto votes > * At least 3 + votes. > > I propose that we consider all commiter votes not just "binding" PMC > votes. > > I also propose to run the vote until Tue 9 Feb 2010. At that point I > will total the votes. > > Please vote in a message replying to this one to make it easier to find > the votes. > > It goes without saying (well clearly not) that if you vote yes you > should have a reason to think that the release is good enough - I'd > suggest downloading whatever you know most about and trying it. > > Thanks > > Andrew > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > >
