Thanks for the info, Cliff! You've done some great work on this.

On 02/04/2010 07:54 PM, Cliff Jansen (Interop Systems Inc) wrote:
The existing 0.6 version of the WCF/C++ client provides basic WCF
functionality.  Its most significant additional feature is distributed
transaction support for enterprise applications.  The WCF channel
portion relies on the well tested and high performance C++ native
client libraries for most of the logic at the transport and session
layers.  The current status and future wish list are summarized in the
top-level ReadMe.txt file.

I'd be keen to hear more of your thoughts an opinions on the new API for the c++ client. Though the existing 0-10 specific API will remain, I anticipate improvements and added features via the new API (producer flow control for example, and it already has built in reconnection and replay logic).

The long term goal of the WCF channel is to provide .NET programmers
with a full featured AMQP messaging client.  To maximize adoption, it
uses the same programming model used by the Microsoft WCF channel
implementations for messaging over MSMQ and over WebSphere MQ.  To
maximize functionality, it incorporates or has planned features for
AMQP specific capabilities (such as local transactions which will
require some magic to associate separate WCF channels with a single
AMQP session).

A further goal is to maximize the interoperability of the WCF channel
with other AMQP clients by providing full access to AMQP types in
message headers and the message body.  In 0.6 it is possible to
exchange int and string properties between JMS and WCF clients.  Text
and binary content can also be shared between clients as demonstrated
by the WcfPerftest sample program.  Expanding this to include all JMS
message properties and supporting AMQP map messages is proposed as a
high priority improvement for the WCF channel in the 0.7 timeframe
(consistent with the goals of QPID-2226).

It would be worth seeing if we can get better alignment between the examples for all languages. That's a great way to demonstrate the basic interoperability and is especially helpful when for clients with quite different programming models.

Documentation of some form would be really great (even if its links elsewhere) on that front also. The samples are really quite different to those for the other clients. I don't have previous experience of WCF, and it may be more obvious to those that do. Even there though some description of the mapping of WCF to AMQP would be important.

I notice for example you use uris that look similar to the JMS "binding urls". Is the same syntax supported? There are some usability issues with that format (in my opinion), especially when using more complex patterns.





---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to