[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867219#action_12867219
]
Cliff Jansen commented on QPID-2589:
------------------------------------
A timeout for send() (to match get() and fetch()) would be useful to WCF since
the call can block. Does this seem useful in general?
Is there an async receive existing or planned like the older MessageListener?
I see the nextReceiver() call, but as I see it, this requires a dedicated
thread per Session to poll for the client's next message, whereas the 0-10
allowed a single thread or small pool to service the handed off message from
all sessions.
> Add a .NET binding to QPID Messaging API
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-2589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2589
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: C++ Client
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Environment: Windows
> Reporter: Chuck Rolke
> Assignee: Ted Ross
> Fix For: 0.7
>
> Attachments: qpid_bindings.diff
>
>
> This binding package is a .NET Interop wrapper around the Qpid Messaging
> interface. It exposes the Messaging interface through a series of managed
> code classes that may be used by any .NET language.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
