+1 for deleting the 0-10 .Net client but -1 for the 0-8 client which does work/interop with the Java Broker.
Marnie On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi All, > > Yet again there was another user who had downloaded the old .NET > client and was having trouble with it. > There is nobody there to support these users and these clients have been > buggy. > > Aidan made a valiant effort to maintain these with contributions from > one or two folks. > But I doubt we have enough to maintain these clients to the same > quality offered by our other clients. > The situation is now even more complicated with the WCF and the new > .NET binding. > These approaches seems to be more long term (and I certainly hope it will). > In any case we don't have the resources to maintain 4 code bases. > > Hence I propose the following measures and I'd like to know what the > community thinks. > > 1. Remove the 0-8/0-10 .NET clients from the download page. > We know they are buggy and there is nobody to support them. I > think we do more harm to our reputation by leaving them there. > > 2. Remove the old 0-8/0-10 .NET clients from the trunk. > 2.1 As per Apache rules we have to ship a source tarball anytime > we do a release. > I don't think it's appropriate the to ship unmaintained and > buggy code. > > 2.2 Trunk is for active development. I don't think we should > carry dead code. > > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > >
