[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17435519#comment-17435519
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on QPIDJMS-553:
----------------------------------------
franz1981 commented on pull request #45:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-jms/pull/45#issuecomment-953985185
A different approach on this would be to pre-allocate the shared event loop
group on the connection factory and decide some policy that would shutdown it
eg although I don't like finalizers, it could be an option, or after "some
time" no JmsSession reference any event loop from the group
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Shared Netty event loop group
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: QPIDJMS-553
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-553
> Project: Qpid JMS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Francesco Nigro
> Priority: Major
>
> One of the most interesting feature of Netty while using KQueue/NIO/Epoll in
> non-blocking mode is to be able to handle many connections with few threads;
> this is going to be critical and even more important with the upcoming
> IO_URING support, where the time spent on the Netty event loop to handle
> network syscalls will be further reduced, allowing syscall batching across
> different connections.
> Having the chance to handle many client connections with few Netty threads is
> already beneficial in constrained environments (containers with few cores) in
> order to reduce the native and heap memory usage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
