[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jiri Daněk updated PROTON-2494:
-------------------------------
Description:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/356#pullrequestreview-872590821
{quote}
I can see inconsistency between openssl and cyrus sasl libs. We don't seem to
use pkgconfig for cyrus sasl in the same way as for openssl. ~And in fact we
seem to have to work around not using pkg-config when we are on windows in a
strange way!
Also we include some (copied in) code to interface to pkgconfig, but there
seems to be a good pypi package - pkgconfig which does this stuff and is geared
up for use in setup.py too. Maybe we should be using this rather than the
strange homegrown thing we've got?{quote}
was:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/356#pullrequestreview-872590821
{quote}
I can see inconsistency between openssl and cyrus sasl libs. We don't seem to
use pkgconfig for cyrus sasl in the same way as for openssl. ~And in fact we
seem to have to work around not using pkg-config when we are on windows in a
strange way!
Also we include some (copied in) code to interface to pkgconfig, but there
seems to be a good pypi package - pkgconfig which does this stuff and is geared
up for use in setup.py too. Maybe we should be using this rather than the
strange homegrown thing we've got?
{quote}
> Improve python-qpid-proton wheel build regarding pkgconfig and deps
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-2494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2494
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build, python-binding
> Affects Versions: proton-c-0.36.0
> Reporter: Jiri Daněk
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: proton-c-future
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/356#pullrequestreview-872590821
> {quote}
> I can see inconsistency between openssl and cyrus sasl libs. We don't seem to
> use pkgconfig for cyrus sasl in the same way as for openssl. ~And in fact we
> seem to have to work around not using pkg-config when we are on windows in a
> strange way!
> Also we include some (copied in) code to interface to pkgconfig, but there
> seems to be a good pypi package - pkgconfig which does this stuff and is
> geared up for use in setup.py too. Maybe we should be using this rather than
> the strange homegrown thing we've got?{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
