On 08/20/2010 05:45 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
Hi.
I'm currently looking at the 0-10 transport layer in more detail, and
want to add a (currently) MINA based VM mechanism to the existing
socket based one, and eventually I envisage pluggable OSGi modules
that implement Netty or Grizzly transports for both the client and the
broker, using any AMQP protocol.
My understanding we where trying to get rid of MINA in the Java client,
this implies going the other way. I believe this need to be debated, as I
think we want to get rid of the mina dependency which is preventing
some of the needed JMS cleanup. Rob, Rafi, Rajith... please comment...
Carl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
