Hi Bruno,

> Thanks for the reply.

You're welcome.

> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 07:06 -0400, Steve Huston wrote:
> > Hi Bruno,
> > 
> > > I'm facing some performance issues with a Windows client. I
> > > made some tests and the difference is between 625857 
> > > microseconds/packet in Windows and 30110 microseconds/packet 
> > > in Linux. This is the average of 10.000.000 packets.
> > > 
> > > The windows libs were compiled from svn tag 0.6, and the
> > > Linux libs are from Fodera 13's Yum repos.
> > 
> > What version of Qpid did you test with on Fedora?
> 
> I'm using 0.6.
> 
> > 
> > > Some ideas? There are any precopiled distribution supported
> > > by the project?
> > 
> > You can get a Qpid 0.6 installable from 
> > http://www.riverace.com/qpid/downloads.htm, but it's 0.6 - probably 
> > not significantly different from what you tested.
> > 
> 
> With this libs I get 573361 microseconds/packet. A little 
> less, but not enough.

Right...

> > If you get profiling info that may help to improve this, 
> please let me 
> > know. I'm also available to help get that information.
> 
> I think I will do a simple test program only for this. What 
> do I need to get useful profiling information?

Output from any reasonable performance measurement. Something like
Rational Quantify would do it, or one of Intel's thread measuring tools
(I forget the name).

-Steve

--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to