oops, no attachment.

http://people.apache.org/~chug/QPID-0.8-Component-Architecture.pdf

-C

----- "Chuck Rolke" <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: "Chuck Rolke" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 5:21:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: How easy is it to get Qpid going ?
>
> I'd like to contribute a picture or two. Please comment on the current
> attachement.
> 
> I'm trying to show how the parts relate to each other. I'm most
> familiar with
> the Cpp block so I'm most sure of what's going on in that part.
> 
> My understandings are:
> 1. The Java stack goes end to end with no support required from Cpp.
> 
> 2. WCF uses xarm (transaction resource manager) and the client, no
> messaging.
> 
> 3. Python and Ruby QMF clients use the C++ QMF binding.
> 
> 4. Python, Ruby, and .NET QPID clients use the C++ QPID binding.
> 
> 5. Top level DOTNET client uses nothing from Cpp and is being
> deprecated.
> 
> 6. Top level Python client uses nothing from Cpp but still works.
>    It is probably not as great a choice as the Python Qpid binding
> for
>    performance reasons. It should be kept as a/the reference
> implementation.
> 
> 7. Top level Ruby client is being deprecated.
> 
> I could use help showing relationships inside the Java box.
> 
> I think that if this one picture were broken into maybe five with each
> showing
> different levels of detail it would be useful.
> 
> Regards,
> Chuck
> 
> ----- "Jonathan Robie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: "Jonathan Robie" <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:27:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
> Eastern
> > Subject: Re: How easy is it to get Qpid going ?
> >
> > On 11/22/2010 02:15 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> > 
> > > Most of us work directly with the source tree, so we know that
> > works.
> > 
> > We also need to make the source tree more accessible. The new
> > top-level 
> > README.txt at least identifies which components can be found in the
> 
> > source tree, and points to their README.txt files. If we continue
> the
> > 
> > path top-down so that each component clearly says how to build it,
> and
> > 
> > gives some overview, that should help a great deal.
> > 
> > And I don't think that would take that much work. But the people 
> > responsible for each component should do that.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to