[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12968639#action_12968639
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2969:
----------------------------------
>From
>http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/api/javax/jms/ConnectionFactory.html:
"It is expected that JMS providers will provide the tools an administrator
needs to create and configure administered objects in a JNDI namespace. JMS
provider implementations of administered objects should be both
javax.jndi.Referenceable and java.io.Serializable so that they can be stored in
all JNDI naming contexts. In addition, it is recommended that these
implementations follow the JavaBeansTM design patterns. "
You are probably correct that it is not strictly necessary, but it seems like a
good idea, encouraged by the spec itself. I agree that all the destination
implementations should follow the same approach in any case.
> AMQConnectionFactory is not Serializable
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-2969
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2969
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Client
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Gordon Sim
>
> It should be, in order to allow it to be stored in JNDI.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
