-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/479/#review314
-----------------------------------------------------------


Nothing leaps out as an obvious issue here. Although I think the SCM class 
should probably in qpid/sys/windows as it seems to implement a platform 
specific functionality rather than be a necessary windows variant of existing 
code.

We are working towards no platform variants of the existing code and all 
platform specific code in qpid/sys/[posix|windows|...] with platform variances 
abstracted through different interface implementations.

- Andrew


On 2011-03-07 18:15:46, Steve Huston wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/479/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-03-07 18:15:46)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid and Andrew Stitcher.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Proposed changes to allow the broker to run as a Windows Service. Adds 
> command line options to qpidd to install, uninstall, start, stop the service, 
> as well as the detection that qpidd was started from the service manager and 
> act accordingly (register w/ SCM, default logging to the system event log).
> 
> 
> This addresses bug QPID-2519.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2519
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/CMakeLists.txt 1072051 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/posix/QpiddBroker.cpp 1072051 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/qpidd.h 1072051 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/qpidd.cpp 1072051 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/windows/QpiddBroker.cpp 1072051 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/windows/SCM.h PRE-CREATION 
>   /branches/QPID-2519/cpp/src/windows/SCM.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/479/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Basic install, uninstall, start, stop. Has a problem running as LocalService 
> that I don't yet know the cause of.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
>

Reply via email to