On 17 March 2011 21:56, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, everyone. Using revision 1082154 from Wednesday, I have generated > our RC1 release artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~nsantos/qpid-0.10-rc1/ > > As Gordon suggested we do, with this release I've removed the orphaned > dotnet and ruby tarballs from the artifacts. I've also verified that > the versions in the qmf and tools modules have been updated to 0.10. >
I know Gordon said: "Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for the release - we remove them from the published list: qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10-beta.zip qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10-beta. zip qpid-ruby-0.10-beta.tar.gz This will avoid giving false impressions about ongoing maintenance for these clients" But I think that if we are going to actually do this, we should formally vote for it, and move the codebases for these artefacts into an "attic" directory or similar. I'm not against removing unloved and unmaintained code... but I do feel that we should vote before adding or removing artefacts to/from the release. -- Rob
