[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014843#comment-13014843
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-3177:
-----------------------------------
This is close enough to the end that I'd like to get Rob or Robbie to weigh in
as well.
> JMS Failover Not Working
> ------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-3177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3177
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
> Assignee: Rajith Attapattu
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.11
>
>
> The JMS failover is not working due to a regression introduced in rev 1071631.
> More specifically the reason is the following line being removed.
> @@ -257,12 +256,14 @@
> ConnectionClose close = exc.getClose();
> if (close == null)
> {
> + _conn.getProtocolHandler().setFailoverLatch(new
> CountDownLatch(1));
> +
> try
> {
> if (_conn.firePreFailover(false) &&
> _conn.attemptReconnection())
> {
> _conn.failoverPrep();
> - _qpidConnection.resume(); ---- > This line is removed
> in this comment.
> + _conn.resubscribeSessions();
> _conn.fireFailoverComplete();
> return;
> }
> On the surface this seems like a unintended omission. However I'd like to
> investigate it further and find out if this was intentional.
> It if it was, then what was the reason behind it?
> The obvious fix is to re-introduce this line. I have done so and preliminary
> tests indicates that it will resolve the issue. I haven't seen any other
> issues.
> However I'd like to look at more information regarding the context of the
> above change before making a final decision.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
