This commit appears to have broken the Java broker build (and also
doesnt have a JIRA reference):
https://builds.apache.org/job/qpid-java-build/123/

Robbie

On 6 June 2011 14:24,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: kpvdr
> Date: Mon Jun  6 13:24:11 2011
> New Revision: 1132628
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1132628&view=rev
> Log:
> Missing spec file change to checkin 1132623
>
> Modified:
>    qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml
>
> Modified: qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml?rev=1132628&r1=1132627&r2=1132628&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml (original)
> +++ qpid/trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml Mon Jun  6 13:24:11 2011
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
>     <property name="address"  type="sstr"   access="RC" index="y"/>
>     <property name="incoming" type="bool"   access="RC"/>
>     <property name="SystemConnection"   type="bool"   access="RC" 
> desc="Infrastucture/ Inter-system connection (Cluster, Federation, ...)"/>
> +    <property name="userProxyAuth"      type="bool"   access="RO" 
> desc="Authorization to proxy for users not on broker"/>
>     <property name="federationLink"     type="bool"   access="RO" desc="Is 
> this a federation link"/>
>     <property name="authIdentity"       type="sstr"   access="RO" 
> desc="authId of connection if authentication enabled"/>
>     <property name="remoteProcessName"  type="lstr"   access="RO" 
> optional="y" desc="Name of executable running as remote client"/>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to