[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Foglia updated QPID-3297:
---------------------------------
Attachment: batch_producer.swig.out
batch_producer.python.out
timing_tests.py
timing_consumer.messaging.py
batch_producer.py
These are my test producer, test consumer, and test runner. Also there are two
timings results from using the pure python API and the SWIG api. (I suggest
just looking at the tail of the files for the summaries.)
> Python SWIG client API seems no faster than pure Python client API
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-3297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3297
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Environment: RHEL 6. Qpid broker version 0.7.946106-28, Python
> client version 0.7.946106-15, SWIG Python client version 0.10.
> Reporter: Anthony Foglia
> Attachments: batch_producer.py, batch_producer.python.out,
> batch_producer.swig.out, timing_consumer.messaging.py, timing_tests.py
>
>
> I am trying to get as high a transfer rate as possible, and while the
> qpid-perftest 50,000 transfers/sec (34,000 publish, 26,000 subscribe), the
> Python consumer I wrote is only reading ~1600 on average. I tried the swig
> version and the average speeds are roughly the same (if not worse), but the
> variance is much greater.
> I'm opening this issue so I can share my client code with others since I
> can't put it on the mailing list. Here is the original thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-users/201106.mbox/ajax/%[email protected]%3E
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
