> On 2011-06-10 15:28:20, Kenneth Giusti wrote: > > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/PersistableQueue.h, line 64 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/860/diff/1/?file=20820#file20820line64> > > > > Ok, discussed this with Kim - his understanding of this pointer is that > > it is owned by the persistent queue, and the queue should be responsible > > for calling delete on it. If that is the case, then there is a bug in > > that the store is referencing this context after the queue is destroyed. > > > > I will work with Kim on this to better understand the root cause and > > fix it properly.
The pointer is opaque from the brokers perspective. It is entirely under the store's control, including whether to even use it. I think it is an error that the PersistableQueue is currently deleting that pointer. The store should do any cleanup as a result of the explicit queue deletion. - Gordon ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/860/#review801 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-06-08 20:31:05, Kenneth Giusti wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/860/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-06-08 20:31:05) > > > Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, Gordon Sim, and Kim van der Riet. > > > Summary > ------- > > Modifies the broker's handling of Message.Accept to hold off the completion > of the command until all messages related to the accept have completed > dequeue. This particularly applies to persistent messages, as the > store::dequeue() operation must complete before the message is considered > fully dequeued. > > Note this bugfix requires some changes to the broker's store module > interface: previously, the store only identified the message when a dequeue > was completed. This is not enough information - the queue from which is was > removed must also be identified (the message may be in the process of being > dequeued on several queues at once). > > > This addresses bug qpid-3079. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/qpid-3079 > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/AsyncCompletion.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/DeliveryRecord.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/DeliveryRecord.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Message.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Message.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/MessageStore.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/MessageStoreModule.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/MessageStoreModule.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/NullMessageStore.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/NullMessageStore.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/PersistableMessage.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/PersistableMessage.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/PersistableQueue.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/RecoverableQueue.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/RecoveryManagerImpl.cpp > 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SemanticState.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SessionContext.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SessionState.h 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SessionState.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/tests/AsyncCompletion.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/tests/QueueTest.cpp 1124895 > /branches/qpid-3079/qpid/cpp/src/tests/TestMessageStore.h 1124895 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/860/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > broker unit tests, store unit tests (modified jboss store). Still needs to > be vetted on non-linux, and have latest trunk merged in. > > > Thanks, > > Kenneth > >
