On 28 Oct 2011, at 15h19, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 10/28/2011 03:17 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >> On 28 October 2011 15:12, Gordon Sim<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/26/2011 08:38 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: >>> >>>> Use queue state replication and client failover via the address or >>>> failover exchange. >>>> >>> >>> A few words of warning... as it stands there are a few operational issues >>> with that 'feature' you should be aware of: >>> >>> * if links are down replication events can back up very fast and there is >>> no way to manage this >>> * resuming replication is impossible if any events are lost >>> * its a little cumbersome to configure
Good to know. >>> [I've been experimenting with a much nicer design proposed by Ted. I have a >>> working patch but its unlikely to get committed anytime soon] >>> >>> >> Is this something that would also be useful to implement in the Java >> Broker... > > Yes +1, definitely. >> is there a public design document for it? > > No, not yet. As I say its an experimental patch only at this stage, primarily > because I was intrigued by the idea. I'm only mentioning it here as it fixes > the issues with the existing queue replication very effectively. I'd be very interested in looking at this, if you could supply more details about your design, Gordon. Cheers, Andrew. -- -- andrew d kennedy ? +447582293255 : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ; --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
