[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13152427#comment-13152427
 ] 

[email protected] commented on QPID-3602:
-----------------------------------------------------



bq.  On 2011-11-17 21:22:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
bq.  > In addition to the code-specific items already noted, I thought id 
mention that it would be good if this change pulled in the rollback/recover 
related completion issue Keith and I patched today. As I mentioned on the phone 
earlier, we went for the simplest (albeit hacky) solution we could to make it 
clearer for inclusion in the release, but it would be nice to see it cleaned 
up. This change looks to take care of the messages which were actually 
delivered before the rollback was performed, but it still wont handle the ones 
which were only prefetched.
bq.  > 
bq.  > I noticed that you stopped the flusher thread running for modes other 
than DUPS_OK, which is nice. Alex questioned whether this change would affect 
browsers or not because they ignore the session acknowledge mode and go with 
NO_ACK behaviour. Looking it over I think it seems fine due to the 
processCompletions call in postDeliver(), but its possibly still worth a check.
bq.  
bq.  rajith attapattu wrote:
bq.      Your observation is correct, this deals with messages that were 
already received by the application.
bq.      For recover(), we really don't need to send completions for the 
transfers we get bcos we do a stop and start which re-issues the credit. But 
for correctness we should mark them complete. As for rollback we definitely 
should mark the messages that were in the prefetch buffer as complete so we get 
re-credited. 
bq.      Let me pull in the change and see how I could integrate it with some 
cleanup.
bq.      
bq.      Starting the flusher thread only for DUPS_OK was overdue :)
bq.      Do we have any existing tests that test this specific aspect of 
QueueBrowsers ?
bq.  
bq.  Robbie Gemmell wrote:
bq.      >For recover(), we really don't need to send completions for the 
transfers we get bcos we do a stop and start which re-issues the credit.
bq.      
bq.      I dont think that is correct. There is a discussion on the mailing 
lists at the moment about the behavioural differences in credit window sizing 
between the Java and C++ brokers, and the initial outcome looks like making the 
C++ broker move to doing what the Java broker does. In that case, it is 
necessary for the client to complete all the commands during recover, or the 
broker will simply consider that you have already used [some of] the new credit 
you are issuing because you still havent completed the outstanding messages (as 
very explicitly mentioned in the 0-10 spec, releasing etc a message does not 
complete it). If it did anything else, you would effectively be allowing the 
broker to breach the requested credit window size in certain situations (as the 
C++ broker currently does).

I don't think it's correct either :D , hence me mentioning "But for correctness 
we should mark them complete".
Yes I was following closely that thread and I agree that the C++ broker should 
do the same as the Java broker.


- rajith


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2853/#review3325
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-11-16 18:31:12, rajith attapattu wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/2853/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2011-11-16 18:31:12)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim, Robbie Gemmell, Weston Price, Keith 
Wall, and Oleksandr Rudyy.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  This patch is for both QPID-3612 & QPID-3613. Please note QPID-3602 is the 
main JIRA for credit related issues.
bq.  
bq.  Message completions are now handled independent of the Message acks.
bq.  
bq.  1. The consumer now keeps track of credits on a per subscription basis 
using the RangeSet "completions" and sends completions,
bq.     if the unCompletedCount >= _capacity/2
bq.     For capacity = 0 or capacity = 1, we use the flag 
"sendCompleteForEveryMsg" to send a completion for each message.
bq.  
bq.  2. Cleanedup the acking process in AMQSession_0_10.java to make acking 
independent of completions.
bq.     2.1 For AUTO_ACK we send an ack after every message.
bq.     2.1 For DUPS_OK we ack if,
bq.            maxAckDelay <= 0 OR
bq.            unackedCount >= ackBatchingThreshold, where ackBatchingThreshold 
== prefetch/2
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug QPID-3602.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3602
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/AMQSession_0_10.java
 1202779 
bq.    
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/client/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/BasicMessageConsumer_0_10.java
 1202779 
bq.    
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/systests/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/client/prefetch/PrefetchBehaviourTest.java
 1202779 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2853/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Added two basic test cases (transacted and client-ack modes) to ensure 
completions are sent in time to ensure credits don't dry up.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  rajith
bq.  
bq.


                
> Fix Consumer message credit issues in 0-10 codepath
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3602
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.14
>            Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
>            Assignee: Rajith Attapattu
>             Fix For: 0.15
>
>
> Currently there are several issues related to message credits.
> 1. QPID-2604 - Getting more messages than required by the prefetch value.
> 2. QPID-3604 - If connection is started and stopped, the client *may* get 
> more messages than required by the prefetch value.
> 3. QPID-3562 - Prefetch=1 case doesn't work properly.
> 4. Prefetch-0 case doesn't work properly (well completely broken).
> 5. QPID-3612 -Message credits are affected by Command Completions and not 
> message-acks. However these two are intertwined in the logic causing some 
> issues. For example when in client-ack mode or using transactions, if the 
> client has exhausted the credits, but is waiting for more messages to come 
> before it acks or commits a transaction, then the client will appear hung 
> (This issue is currently masked due to some of the above bugs). 
> 6. QPID-3613 Credit should be managed on a per subscription basis than on a 
> per session basis.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to